![]() |
| Graph: motherjones.com |
A story in today's San Jose, California-based Mercury News discusses the phenomenon of the have-less, and focuses on issues "older workers" face. The bleak news, quietly tucked away on a low readership national holiday weekend, is sobering. The article summarizes its points as follows:
- A recovery that for many older workers doesn't feel like one.
- Two-thirds of baby boomers between ages 55 and 64 who found work after losing it in the recession are making less than they did in their previous jobs.
- Their median salary loss is 18 percent, compared with a 6.7 drop for 20- to 24-year-olds.
- The re-employment rate for this older age group is 47 percent, and 24 percent for those over 65, versus 62 percent for 20- to 24-year-olds.
- Finding another job takes far longer, too: 46 weeks for boomers, compared to 20 weeks for young workers.
The Mercury News piece cites a recent report from the California Budget Project to deliver these unpleasant facts and conclusions. Economic "progress," the story notes
is complicated by a triple whammy of wage stagnation, a dramatic growth of low-wage jobs in hospitality and food services, and the staggering number of jobs lost in California during the recession -- 1.4 million, nearly half of which have yet to come back.The California report could easily be repeated in nearly every other state in the Union. Does this sound like "progress" to you?


