Fewer people are accepting the U's well-rehearsed, arrogant financial song-and-dance. Stories such as one the Chicago Tribune reported today are among the reasons why.
University of Illinois-Chicago chancellor Paula Allen-Meares (Image: University of Illinois-Chicago) |
When the Trib journalists raised pointed questions about this curious arrangement, the university tried its best to deflect the issue, misrepresent activities associated with the house, and wish the whole episode away. Chancellor Allen-Meares did not deign to answer any reporters' inquiries, even though she works for a public institution.
Universities generally don't like this sort of spotlight. They're uncomfortable explaining why their chosen few enjoy privileged lives while students and their families get financially squeezed. Chancellor Allen-Meares earns over $400,000 annually. That's over and above the free housing UIC maintains for her, while the school pays annual maintenance charges of approximately $100,000 on it. Allen-Meares is on the last legs of her five-year contract. If the university's board gives her a clean bill of employment health, she stands to earn a $375,000 bonus. The UIC chancellor does not get a cash housing allowance. However, the chancellors of the other two University of Illinois campuses do. Those yearly stipends range from $24,000 to around $30,000. Considering these are very highly compensated employees, the allowance is akin to throwing money at the chancellors. Why do they need a housing allowance at all?
Ah, but in the corrupt world of senior academic administration, these payoffs are part of the game. The next time someone tells you about the financial struggles of Alma Mater, tell them what the U really needs is financial transparency, responsible executives, and a commitment to end corruption. Then ask them how quickly the U will act on those initiatives. And, yes, "never" is an answer.
No comments:
Post a Comment