The episode led me to consider how I would have planned a visit to another destination. Coincidentally, the online edition of today's New York Times included a piece by the writer Henry Alford that demonstrated one approach to this issue. It is a well structured and intriguingly conceived article, in which Alford discusses a recent visit to Stockholm.
Henry Alford (photograph from Vanity Fair) |
Alford does hedge his bets by going to friendly, safe, English-speaking Sweden. The mitigation of the language barrier makes his contact with locals a relatively painless maneuver not easily duplicated in, say, Bulgaria. However, Alford's proposition is a very interesting one, in that gets to the heart of the social media value proposition. By identifying his travel and other preferences, Alford could obtain travel information presumably consistent with his personality and desires. By the way, the writer, who is in his fifties, was completely comfortable considering experiences and sights bloggers half his age enjoyed.
In essence, Alford challenged both the strong case for "traditional," branded travel books and magazines as well as the "new media" approach to obtaining useful travel information. While his social media pathway may seem obvious, it is in practice a challenging proposition to successfully manage. One needs time, patience, a willingness to sift through bloggers' opinions, and destinations where Alford's type of travel research would pay dividends. It's one thing to check out hipster bastions such as Stockholm or Amsterdam; it's quite another to learn more insightful, reliable information about the hipster world's version of terra incognita.
We'll see if Alford's method works for me on my next trip to Philadelphia.
No comments:
Post a Comment